JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 1, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Bernal Cano Natalia·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
  • Improcedencia por falta de carga argumentativa
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes de nulidad de la Sentencia C-066/23 formuladas por la doctora Natalia Ángel Bernal.

Tras analizar las diferentes peticiones de la precitada ciudadana la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLAS.

Lo anterior, porque una se presentó de manera extemporánea y las otras no cumplieron con la exigencia de carga argumentativa.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR las solicitudes de nulidad presentadas por la doctora Natalia Bernal Cano en contra de la Sentencia C-066 de 2023, de conformidad con las razones expuestas en la parte motiva.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no proceden recursos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.